Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:28

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Appendix cancers on the rise in younger generations, study finds - NBC News
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why is it called iOS 26? What happened to iOS 19 for iPhone - 9to5Mac
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Can Make Anyone Look Bad - Defector
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How could Trump, with his deplorable garbage supporters, manage to win an election?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
What is the happy reality of our generation?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Post-COVID Fatigue: Is Your Gut To Blame? - SciTechDaily
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
I am a copy and paste developer, how do I become a real software developer?